A Simple Key For family law cases Unveiled
A Simple Key For family law cases Unveiled
Blog Article
77 . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 of your Constitution based about the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued on the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement during the FIR lodged by FIA and while in the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
14. Inside the light on the position explained over, it's concluded that a civil servant features a fundamental right for being promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but couldn't be regarded as for no fault of his own and In the meantime he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency in the duration of service or within the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 269 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
A survey of PACER buyers, conducted in 2021, measured user satisfaction and recognized areas for improvement with PACER services. The Administrative Office of your U.S. Courts is using the survey results to evaluate and prioritize long run changes to PACER services and attributes.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-224033 Tag:Given the legal analysis on the subject issue, we are from the view that the claim on the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their initial contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle isn't legally audio, Moreover promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They may be topic to rules and regulations When the recruitment rules of the topic post permit the case on the petitioners for promotion may very well be regarded as, however, we are very clear in our point of view that contractual service cannot be considered for seniority and promotion as the seniority is reckoned from the date of normal appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Health, matter to availability of vacancy topic into the approval in the competent authority.
139 . Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Given the legal analysis on the topic issue, we've been of your view that the claim of your petitioners for retroactive regularization from their Original contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle is not legally sound, In addition to promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They can be topic to rules and regulations When the recruitment rules of the subject post permit the case of the petitioners for promotion could possibly be deemed, however, we've been clear inside our point of view that contractual service cannot be regarded for seniority and promotion because the seniority is reckoned from the date of regular appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Conditioning, matter to availability of vacancy matter towards the approval from the competent authority.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming into the main case, it is also a nicely-proven proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence in the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is subject matter to the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-take pleasure in the evidence and to reach at its independent findings on the evidence.
The ruling from the first court created case legislation that must be accompanied by other courts till or unless both new law is created, or maybe a higher court rules differently.
There are many cases where death was never intended – even more where These nominated during the FIR were not present when the injury or death occurred. The death of the human being is a tragic event. But the death of any living being isn't any significantly less a tragic event.
Section 302 of your PPC outlines the punishment for “Qatl-i-Amd” (intentional murder) in Pakistan. According to this provision, if a person intentionally causes the death of another individual, they shall be topic towards the most severe form of punishment permissible under Pakistani law.
two. I have read the realized counsel for that parties and acquired DPG at size, perused the record and observed that:-
The appellate court determined that the trial court experienced not erred in its decision to allow more time for information to generally be gathered with the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.
The case of *R v. Ahmed* exemplifies the sensible application of this amendment and its probable to safe financial interests and maintain the integrity on the national currency. As legal practitioners and citizens, an extensive grasp of these changes is vital for upholding the principles of justice and contributing to a sturdy legal system.
The residents argued that the high-voltage grid station would pose a health risk and opportunity hazard to local residents. In the end, the court determined the scientific evidence inconclusive, whilst observing the general development supports that electromagnetic fields have destructive effects on human health. The Court accepted the petitioner’s argument that it should undertake the precautionary principle set out in the 1992 Rio Declaration within the Environment and website Improvement, the first international instrument that linked environment protection with human rights, whereby The dearth of full scientific certainty should not be used to be a reason to prevent environmental degradation.